Monday, May 3, 2010

Semifinals, 03-05-2010

Airtel Super Singer junior 2, Semifinals
Day 1 - May 03, 2010









4 comments:

  1. SemiFinals Rd . Asusual biased. Chitra , Mano , Subha proving day by day how they can be so immatured . i Still dont understand how cud Alka's ...sahana song beat Shravan's -Ulaathil .. from Karnan ...amazing performance by shravan ...
    Srinisha was much better than Roshan ...

    Judges ..u shud b really ashamed for ur attitude .. U r ones who need to be eliminated .
    Priyanka , Srinisha , Nithyasree .. u r already super singers ...Won million hearts ..

    Pls dont fall at those 'so called' judges' feet ..they dont deserve it ..!! Shame on them !

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also thought that the judges are biased, but in this round I disagree with Sangeetha. The song Alka sang was one of the toughest and I thought she should have got 9 from at least one of the judges. But after seeing how much Nithiyasree and SirNisha got, I think it is fair Alka got 8. Out of the 3 judges, I think Mano is the most biased. Other 2 are okay.
    Vipul

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think Judgement is so much partial towards Alka. She does not deserve to be in the semifinals at all. Her song Sahana and Rajavin parvayil was not upto the mark.

    ReplyDelete
  4. THE CEO
    VIJAY TV

    After compliments

    Reference: Super Singer Junior 2 2010 (Sella kuralukana thedal) dated 4th May 2010

    Freedom of expression is right conferred upon a citizen in democratic country as enshrined in the constitution.

    It may be a fact that a judge could not be able to pick up a mistake made by a contestant. This shall be detected by another in the bench. In case a commentator wants to express his thoughts on the mistakes of judges such constructive criticisms shall be welcome provided such acquisitions are leveled with acceptable substantiation on technical grounds.

    For example Alka’s ‘slow’ show down was picked up by Mr.Mano. To be honest I also felt that Alka could not match the beat and was forced to be on slow track. May be Mrs.Chitra might had missed it or may be she never wanted to burden a child contestant with many mistakes. My opinion is that Alka’s performances are much suited to the usual band with melodious song and not sort of Jazz type.

    In my view, the judges are up to now performing their task in the following manner. Mrs.Chitra and Mr.Mano are picking up microscopic corrections and Ms.Shuba gives a positive strength and encouragement to the kids. They all encourage the contestants along with the corrections.

    This is where “Ms.fadafat” the “sella kuralukkana thedal” has an advantage over any other contestants. This little wonder represents a complete package with in her as the criterion is for “sella kuralukkana thedal”.

    The award of Rs 1 lakh to Srikanth seems to be reasonable in spite of observations by Ms.Suchitra because the ‘CRITERIA’ to be satisfied by the contestant.

    Dear Mr.Camaraman while you focus the camera makes sure to feel that they are kids and have the choice of their own outfit. By the way the ‘angel’ what’s that special facial expressions? In any case it adds colour to the show.

    VIJAY TV you guys made me to stick on to the chair and made me to forget my “Post Graduate on line course’. Do you think it’s reasonable on your part? Congratulations guys. Keep up the good work.

    Yours faithfully
    Vijay Kumar-Sultanate of Oman.

    ReplyDelete

 
koffee with anu super singer jodi no 1 anu alavum bayam illai celebrating kamal's 50 vijay tv vanga pesalam kallikaattu pallkoodam maharani vijay awards vpl en peyar meenakshi yuvan vijay tv anchors kings of comedy