After all the drama of the Airtel Super Singer 3 and now we all feel that judges have no take on the winners of the show. Last season we thought that it was due to judges that Ajeesh became the winner, if you still think so, please read on.. Singer and judge Srinivas and commented in his facebook page that judges dont have take on choosing the winner since this being a public voting determination. They really dont have a take on who should be or what should be the winning list. Its all based on public votes that chooses the winner and runner ups. Its nice to see Srinivas mentioning that Satya was his preferred candidate to be the winner and in the same time he also mentions Sai Sharan is deserving.
Its sad that music has taken a back seat with santosh getting ahead of Satya but public sentiments and votes is what that chooses the winners. So, guys lets not blame anyone else than ourselves if you are disappointed with the results. All four contestants will have a long way to go in their musical careers.
but even 100% public is also dangerous scenario!!!!!!!!!!!! if u say public voting but u can see more people showing displeasure of the results order....thats means public also voted for satyaprakash and pooja........pls be transparent in telling how many votes differences...even i feel money wud be playing big role in deciding title...if u see saicharan's mother was relaxed and cool before annoucing the results as if she knows the results before hand and we can compare her body language before rounds . all politics . i am sure if saisharan and santosh sings for any movies that songs will super duper flop...........
ReplyDeletePublic Choice of selecting Sai Charan is correct. Thank God this time the final choice has gone to Public otherwise, the judges would have given Satya and Pooja joint Winners and with least difference of 0.5 marks would have made Sai Charan as runner-up. They will have all brilliant ideas to get both Satya and Pooja to give winners however best Sai Charan sang. I am not sure , the judge Srinivas has commented in this column. If Srinivas Doriasamy who has commented in this column is one of the judges of Super Singer, then I am really sorry for him for having comment that Satya deserves the victory. That shows the judges are partial in eliminating Sai Charan in the semifinal. I feel the judges would have made this choice of order Sai Charan , Pooja , Satya even in the semifinal .For Pooja they gave liberal marks in the Semi final and they want Satya to come to the final that made Sai Charan scapegoat in the semifinal selection. I request Vijay TV not to select these three these judges for at least another couple of contests. Sai Charan is the winner , the reason being Sai Charan can twist the words with the sound while singing and he can show more feel for the songs . Satya can twist only the sound so he is good at small sangithi and swarams. It is more like carnatic songs. Also Satya does not have the sweetness in his voice which is required for playback singing . Even in the carnatic category some of the judges given Sai Charan more credit especially T.L. Mahajan. M.S . Viswanathan and Ramamurthy appreciated his patriotic songs and given golden bracelet to Sai Charan. I feel Mr. Srinivas can give chance to Satya in his music if Producer and Director agrees.
ReplyDeleteYeah......When the judges had THE POWER to select, they kept pushing in Malavika, Soundarya and Sakthi as much as possible and ELIMINATED deserving contestants like Srinivasan, Kaushik and Madhu S. In the wildcard round, NO WONDER, the PUBLIC messed up with the voting!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWhen judges had the OPPORTUNITY to judge, they gave "Half-mark" difference between Sathya and Sai in the semi-final and sent in Pooja as the first finalist. NOW, with what face are they talking about public voting?????
ReplyDeleteMr. Srinivas blasted Pooja for taking the same genre again and again in the semi-final. And in the very next round, he selected Pooja as the 1st finalist. AND, when Santosh sang "Poojaikkaaga" in the pre-finals, he comments "This is the 1st time I'm hearing such a genre from you Santosh"......So, if Santosh have never been EXPERIMENTAL, why select them for the final IN THE FIRST PLACE?.....WHAT AN ATROCITY....
Satya was the deserving candidate.. all are cheating.. all are fixed..Sai charan shoukd be second behind Sathya.. Sathya We are to support you... Sai may be the winner of super singer!1 Sathya is the winner of hearts of millions of people!! Don worry sathya u will be a rocking star oneday!!aLL FIXED...
ReplyDeleteHi Vijay TV
ReplyDeleteI wanted to post this comment for quite sometime but somehow in my shock at seeing the atrocity committed by your PANEL OF JUDGES AND VIJAY TV in doing A POSTMORTEM OF THE GRAND FINALE I did not post before. With due respect to your learned judges, I want to say this, judges--you could be musically endowed, you might know the nuances of music well BUT YOU DO NOT KNOW THE NUANCES OF HUMAN PSYCHE which is probably a factor that pushed you to DISCREDIT TOTALLY PEOPLE'S VERDICT. Judge Srinivas spoke in his POSTMORTEM MORE LIKE A FANATIC FAN OF SATHYA PRAKASH(of course Sathya is a good singer--no doubt about that at all) THAN AS A JUDGE OF MUSIC WHO RESPECTS PUBLIC VERDICT. He kept on saying that the judges were all music lovers and musicians implying as if WE THE PEOPLE, WE THE LISTENERS ARE STONE DEAF OR MUSICALLY DEAD. Sirs and Madams, WE MAY NOT BE M.S.Subbulakshmis or S.P.Bs or Jesudas--but we do HAVE LISTENING EARS AND THERE IS SOMETHING CALLED A MUSICAL NERVE THAT EXISTS IN EVERY ONE OF US that has VOTED FOR SAI CHARAN. By keeping on repeating THAT SAI CHARAN DESERVED TO BE IN SECOND PLACE, MR.SRINIVAS and Co only had expressed their VICARIOUS SATISFACTION.
VIJAY TV AND THE PANEL OF JUDGES HAVE TREATED THE SUPER SINGER 3 TITLE WINNER SAI CHARAN LIKE A CULPRIT WHO GOT FIRST IN AN INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATION BY COPYING OR THROUGH FOUL MEANS. If this kind of FANATIC ATTITUDE and BIASED ATTITUDE condition the panel of judges WHO HAVE TREATED THE MUSIC LOVERS, THE LISTENERS, THE AUDIENCE, THE PUBLIC WHO VOTED FOR SAI CHARAN AS "FILTH" I am really appalled at the "elitism" demonstrated by these Panel as well as Vijay TV.
If we, the voters, we the listeners' have filthy music taste, these "renowned" panel of judges, few of whom are "renowned" or "popular" singers, would not be in the music industry today. Any music director might have introducted these panel of judges into the film industry--but we the listeners, who have "substandard" taste according to the panel of judges, are the real people who have been the reason behind the popularity of these singers. So DO NOT BELITTLE OUR JUDGEMENT. What Judge Singer Srinivas spoke about SAI CHARAN JUST REMINDED ME OF THE FAMOUS ANTONY'S ORATION IN "JULIUS CAESAR" since the tongue in the cheek attitude of the judge is really humiliating and insulting the achievement of SUPER SINGER 3 SAI CHARAN. Here afterwards I DO NOT WANT TO FOLLOW ANY COMPETITIVE VIJAY TV PROGRAMMES AND I DO NOT WANT TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY PUBLIC VOTING WHICH IS LATER PUT DOWN BY A PANEL OF POSTMORTEM SPECIALISTS. Next time, conduct the MUSICAL CONTEST BEHIND CLOSED DOORS AND MAKE THE JUDGES "THE ONLY MUSIC LOVERS" IN THE WORLD, DECIDE THE VERDICT AND GIVE IT TO ANYBODY THEY LIKE WITHOUT ANY ACKWARD POSTMORTEMS AND SAVE THE SELF-RESPECT OF THE PUBLIC. A big group of followers have been judiciously watching Airtel Super Singer 3 and despite being overseas we voted promptly for Sai Charan ONLY TO BE BRANDED BY YOUR Judge as "non-music lovers" as opposed to Judges who are "music lovers" and "genius".